RT @eurogene: another look at two different but complementary reviews on validity of nutrigenetics / nutrigenomics 1) A Systematic Review…
RT @eurogene: another look at two different but complementary reviews on validity of nutrigenetics / nutrigenomics 1) A Systematic Review…
RT @eurogene: another look at two different but complementary reviews on validity of nutrigenetics / nutrigenomics 1) A Systematic Review…
another look at two different but complementary reviews on validity of nutrigenetics / nutrigenomics 1) A Systematic Review inc @JustineKeathley, @RobertCGreen @MCVOHL1 & @Genomes2People - https://t.co/zoGvpUgWoU 2) Guidelines by @Food4Me_EU - https
Interesting study "levels of confidence assessing the validity of genetic markers apply rigorous standards for evaluation of phenotype associations" incl Food4Me guidelines https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R - Whole Genome Interpretation for a Family of Five https:/
RT @eurogene: Editioral by @justinehorneRD (yes another good article!) "Strengthening the Reporting of Nutritional Genomics Research to Inf…
RT @eurogene: Editioral by @justinehorneRD (yes another good article!) "Strengthening the Reporting of Nutritional Genomics Research to Inf…
RT @eurogene: Editioral by @justinehorneRD (yes another good article!) "Strengthening the Reporting of Nutritional Genomics Research to Inf…
Editioral by @justinehorneRD (yes another good article!) "Strengthening the Reporting of Nutritional Genomics Research to Inform Knowledge Translation in Personalized Nutrition" https://t.co/dOe5sdGKwh it's a useful addition to the Food4Me guidelines https
@GSCollins @VPrasadMDMPH Oh, they are there in force - I give you personalized nutrition via ML/AI. https://t.co/sbnbQNqPo7 cc @DylanMacKayPhD
@elsohemy @DylanMacKayPhD @NanciGuestRDPhD @EricTopol @TamarHaspel @PostOpinions I saw the FTO papers you cited. Don’t think they were all RCTs. Maybe one. That’s a good first step but as noted in this article https://t.co/AwW4uoZro1 , which you are an aut
@stephensenn @ShalitUri @jd_wilko @cecilejanssens @ESteyerberg 100%. It's this kind of stuff that gets me riled up: https://t.co/sbnbQNIqfF
@CaulfieldTim @cagraber @nicolatwilley @DrMJoyner Perhaps you good people could work this into some of your reporting one day - it's basically a load of nutrigenomics people saying that they can't run trials because you wouldn't see any effects. This seems
@USGRADEnet @JClinEpi @stephensenn But still, better than these people arguing that lifestyle, personalized approaches can't be tested in trials at all! https://t.co/sbnbQNqPo7
RT @statsepi: @deevybee @MuinJKhoury @cecilejanssens @SciReports Perhaps because people in this "field" have astonishingly argued that they…
RT @statsepi: @deevybee @MuinJKhoury @cecilejanssens @SciReports Perhaps because people in this "field" have astonishingly argued that they…
@deevybee @MuinJKhoury @cecilejanssens @SciReports Perhaps because people in this "field" have astonishingly argued that they can't run randomized trials because they don't expect their interventions to have effects (seriously) https://t.co/sbnbQNqPo7
@perspolicy There is no shortage of people that have a problem with RCTs for their particular intervention. IMO it's usually people peddling something that doesn't work. Here's an example: https://t.co/sbnbQNqPo7
RT @statsepi: @CaulfieldTim @KELLYWEILL Just flagging this up for you folks with big platforms: the personalized X research community has a…
What he said! Accurately predicting your nutritional requirements based on your genes is currently not backed by sufficient scientific evidence.... in the future perhaps, but it’s a waste of your money now.
RT @statsepi: How convenient. https://t.co/V1lGXSErbC "Please purchase your individualized nutrition plan based on your unique genetic prof…
@CaulfieldTim @KELLYWEILL Just flagging this up for you folks with big platforms: the personalized X research community has a paper where they admit their approach doesn't do anything that can actually be evidenced. https://t.co/sbnbQNqPo7
RT @statsepi: @WiringTheBrain It's like the personalized nutrigenomics shills publishing a paper on why they can't produce evidence that wh…
@WiringTheBrain It's like the personalized nutrigenomics shills publishing a paper on why they can't produce evidence that what they sell actually works. In another universe, this paper would be a huge self-own. https://t.co/sbnbQNIqfF I
@cecilejanssens @rahman_nazneen yes there is Cecile! depends on the claims/promises, unfortunately most companies overpromise, a lot are just really bad. BUPA is OK, adds something. Evidence bar is nutrition, not disease. Lot of work in @Food4Me_EU and we
@matthewherper @kristenvbrown You should really check this out. It's basically a paper explaining why the purveyors of this nonsense shouldn't have to provide real evidence that their advice does anything. Just imagine putting this on the brochure. https:/
RT @statsepi: How convenient. https://t.co/V1lGXSErbC "Please purchase your individualized nutrition plan based on your unique genetic prof…
@cecilejanssens @_eleanorina You'll like this: https://t.co/sbnbQNqPo7
RT @statsepi: How convenient. https://t.co/V1lGXSErbC "Please purchase your individualized nutrition plan based on your unique genetic prof…
How convenient. https://t.co/V1lGXSErbC "Please purchase your individualized nutrition plan based on your unique genetic profile. Just don't expect to see any results for a few decades." https://t.co/7K031gZyjN
here are "semi" official guidelines (proposals) for gene-nutrient interactions from the @Food4Me_EU project https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R
@chrissyfarr here are "semi" official guidelines (proposals) for gene-nutrient interactions from the @Food4Me_EU project https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R
i agree with the "most..." - unfortunately that is true, one of the reasons why we developed the Guidelines to evaluate scientific validity for genotype-based dietary advice in @Food4Me_EU project https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R https://t.co/JdXnP3LZWb
@timfrayling @bmj_latest i agree with the "most..." - unfortunately that is true, one of the reasons why we developed the Guidelines to evaluate scientific validity for genotype-based dietary advice in @Food4Me_EU project https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R
@cecilejanssens @NanciGuestRD @DustinToo @TStellingwerff @bendesbrow @Sleep4Sport well they are similar studies to those used by the committees who decide on RDA of vit A, C, D, etc its what we have & have to eat waiting for better studies! A perspecti
Mielenkiintoista luettavaa... Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice https://t.co/WVcvXm0ajy #
RT @flowtiina: Tiina Jylhän klinikallakin toivottavasti luettu. #nutrigenetiikka Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and ev…
Tiina Jylhän klinikallakin toivottavasti luettu. #nutrigenetiikka Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice https://t.co/bJykgm0740
RT @eatlifewell: Personalised Nutrition based on genes have been criticised but having an #evidencebased approach to presenting the recomme…
Personalised Nutrition based on genes have been criticised but having an #evidencebased approach to presenting the recommendings on strength of study is good news! #nutrigenetics https://t.co/mYSEIy2EZq
we have to eat. what? whatever the evidence says at a given time, we can't wait for better evidence before eating... see the BMJ defence of nutrition research: https://t.co/Cr4fp6ZMPO - has a lot in common with the food4me guidelines on genes & nutriti
@RonZimmernPHG Similar for evidence based genomic nutrition, see https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R It's not yet "personalised" but maybe a comparison of subsets of populations, hence more precise, and, we hope, more accurate @DrKhouryCDC
Similar for evidence based genomic nutrition, see https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R It's not yet "personalised" but maybe a comparison of subsets of populations, hence more precise, and, we hope, more accurate https://t.co/J0tDRDq4nk
yes and evidence based nutrition & nutrigenetics... https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R https://t.co/Jzs0hYwnil
Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice #TNO https://t.co/Zv47fpucCb
RT @BANTonline: Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice https://t.co/LF9dFtTh4i
RT @BANTonline: Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice https://t.co/LF9dFtTh4i
Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice https://t.co/LF9dFtTh4i
Yes i agree. We wrote about the benefits & limits of RCTs https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R It’s like the broader nutrition, it’s nice to have, and while we wait for better evidence we have to eat, so we use the evidence that we have - with all its holes &
@Nutrevolve Yes i agree. We wrote about the benefits & limits of RCTs https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R It’s like the broader nutrition, it’s nice to have, and while we wait for better evidence we have to eat, so we use the evidence that we have - with all its h
RT @eurogene: you may be interesting in the Food4Me project guidelines for genes/diet recently published in a journal called Genes & Nutrit…
RT @eurogene: you may be interesting in the Food4Me project guidelines for genes/diet recently published in a journal called Genes & Nutrit…
@CaulfieldTim @cecilejanssens @lasarowa @DrMJoyner @DShaywitz @EricTopol @RobertCGreen @DavidEpstein @stevemagness @trainright @DNAFitHQ @azumioinc @intelliseq @my_helix you may be interesting in the Food4Me project guidelines for genes/diet recently publi
you may be interesting in the Food4Me project guidelines for genes/diet recently published in a journal called Genes & Nutrition https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R https://t.co/HdMEUAnPwU
RT @DrKhouryCDC: Proposed guidelines for evaluating scientific validity and evidence for dietary advice based on genomic information. #nut…
#Genetik testi diyetisyen,spor hocası ya da eczacı,doktor yorumlamaz.Yanilmayin. Genetik-beslenme iliskisi kilavuzu https://t.co/MAbOgRgZP1
RT @DrKhouryCDC: Proposed guidelines for evaluating scientific validity and evidence for dietary advice based on genomic information. #nut…
RT @DrKhouryCDC: Proposed guidelines for evaluating scientific validity and evidence for dietary advice based on genomic information. #nut…
RT @DrKhouryCDC: Proposed guidelines for evaluating scientific validity and evidence for dietary advice based on genomic information. #nut…
Proposed guidelines for evaluating scientific validity and evidence for dietary advice based on genomic information. #nutrigenomics https://t.co/MptMZAEzjG https://t.co/9Al63TzSEY
RT @NanciGuestRD: New! Wow *great* author list! Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary…
RT @NanciGuestRD: New! Wow *great* author list! Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary…
RT @eurogene: Food4me guidelines nutrition-gene, we look at validity, but not “clinical” utility. Why not? You can read here, https://t.co/…
Food4me guidelines nutrition-gene, we look at validity, but not “clinical” utility. Why not? You can read here, https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R, it’s about the limited relevance of nutrition random clinical trials (RCT), need careful interpretation and conclusion
RT @NanciGuestRD: New! Wow *great* author list! Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary…
RT @NanciGuestRD: New! Wow *great* author list! Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary…
RT @NanciGuestRD: New! Wow *great* author list! Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary…
RT @NanciGuestRD: New! Wow *great* author list! Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary…
RT @NanciGuestRD: New! Wow *great* author list! Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary…
yeah... the GREATEST!! https://t.co/UYcGDiCPSI
New! Wow *great* author list! Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice. #Nutrigenomics #Nutrigenetics #PersonalizedNutrition #PersonalizedMedicine @elsohemy https://t.co/uS1p2hp0LB https://t.co/f9f7
RT @eurogene: the BEST "Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice" article EVER! h…
the BEST "Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice" article EVER! https://t.co/n7eb0R3FfK
RT @ThisIsYiannis: Considering the extent of science abuse in the field, this is probably the best publication of the year. https://t.co/9e…
RT @ThisIsYiannis: Considering the extent of science abuse in the field, this is probably the best publication of the year. https://t.co/9e…
RT @ThisIsYiannis: Considering the extent of science abuse in the field, this is probably the best publication of the year. https://t.co/9e…
RT @ThisIsYiannis: Considering the extent of science abuse in the field, this is probably the best publication of the year. https://t.co/9e…
Considering the extent of science abuse in the field, this is probably the best publication of the year. https://t.co/9eEZsqKjG5
Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R, from me, @JildauBouwman @LarsVerschuren @jordovas56 @ProfMikeGibney @Ciri8923 + many other great collaborators - thanks @larry_parn
My colleagues @JildauBouwman @benvanommen and many others proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice https://t.co/KuiZ9aGinb
RT @natasha_wood: With the expansion of personalised services, it's great to see proposed guidelines for assessing scientific validity of c…
RT @eurogene: Food4me project covered many areas of Personalised Nutrition. We spent a lot of time on this, experts across the range from s…
RT @natasha_wood: With the expansion of personalised services, it's great to see proposed guidelines for assessing scientific validity of c…
RT @eurogene: Food4me project covered many areas of Personalised Nutrition. We spent a lot of time on this, experts across the range from s…
RT @eurogene: Food4me project covered many areas of Personalised Nutrition. We spent a lot of time on this, experts across the range from s…
RT @eurogene: Food4me project covered many areas of Personalised Nutrition. We spent a lot of time on this, experts across the range from s…
Food4me project covered many areas of Personalised Nutrition. We spent a lot of time on this, experts across the range from sceptics (but not deniers!) to believers. We wanted guidelines for validation of nutrigenetics etc, here they are https://t.co/7Y9a
RT @eurogene: Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice | Genes & Nutrition | Full…
Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice | Genes & Nutrition | Full Text https://t.co/7Y9a3d8b1R
RT @eurogene: Finally! https://t.co/bjSUvcUmJL Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary…
Finally! https://t.co/bjSUvcUmJL Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice @Food4Me_EU #nutrigenetics #nutrigenomics #personalnutrition #OA