| Title |
Avian Influenza A(H7N2) Virus in Human Exposed to Sick Cats, New York, USA, 2016 - Volume 23, Number 12—December 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2312.170798 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Atanaska Marinova-Petkova, Jen Laplante, Yunho Jang, Brian Lynch, Natosha Zanders, Marisela Rodriguez, Joyce Jones, Sharmi Thor, Erin Hodges, Juan A. De La Cruz, Jessica Belser, Hua Yang, Paul Carney, Bo Shu, LaShondra Berman, Thomas Stark, John Barnes, Fiona Havers, Patrick Yang, Susan C. Trock, Alicia Fry, Larisa Gubareva, Joseph S. Bresee, James Stevens, Demetre Daskalakis, Dakai Liu, Christopher T. Lee, Mia Kim Torchetti, Sandra Newbury, Francine Cigel, Kathy Toohey-Kurth, Kirsten St. George, David E. Wentworth, Stephen Lindstrom, C. Todd Davis |
| Abstract |
An outbreak of influenza A(H7N2) virus in cats in a shelter in New York, NY, USA, resulted in zoonotic transmission. Virus isolated from the infected human was closely related to virus isolated from a cat; both were related to low pathogenicity avian influenza A(H7N2) viruses detected in the United States during the early 2000s. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 33% |
| Japan | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#281,918
of 24,564,172 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#428
of 9,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,415
of 447,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#6
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,564,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.