Title |
Yellow Fever Virus DNA in Urine and Semen of Convalescent Patient, Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.3201/eid2401.171310 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carla M. Barbosa, Nicholas Di Paola, Marielton P. Cunha, Mônica J. Rodrigues-Jesus, Danielle B. Araujo, Vanessa B. Silveira, Fabyano B. Leal, Flávio S. Mesquita, Viviane F. Botosso, Paolo M.A. Zanotto, Edison L. Durigon, Marcos V. Silva, Danielle B.L. Oliveira |
Abstract |
Yellow fever virus RNA is usually detected in blood of infected humans. We detected virus RNA in urine and semen samples from a convalescent patient. A complete virus genome was sequenced for an isolate from a urine sample. This virus had a South American I genotype and unique synapomorphic changes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 28% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
Switzerland | 4 | 7% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Argentina | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 43 | 72% |
Scientists | 9 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 15% |
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#450,104
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#619
of 9,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,447
of 453,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#8
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.