↓ Skip to main content

Clinical utility gene card for: Alagille Syndrome (ALGS)

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Clinical utility gene card for: Alagille Syndrome (ALGS)
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, July 2013
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2013.140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura D Leonard, Grace Chao, Alastair Baker, Kathleen Loomes, Nancy B Spinner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,054,380
of 4,507,652 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#1,195
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,667
of 120,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#85
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.