↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for Cancer Surveillance in Individuals with RASopathies and Other Rare Genetic Conditions with Increased Cancer Risk

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations for Cancer Surveillance in Individuals with RASopathies and Other Rare Genetic Conditions with Increased Cancer Risk
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, June 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0631
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Villani, Mary-Louise C. Greer, Jennifer M. Kalish, Akira Nakagawara, Katherine L. Nathanson, Kristian W. Pajtler, Stefan M. Pfister, Michael F. Walsh, Jonathan D. Wasserman, Kristin Zelley, Christian P. Kratz

Abstract

In October 2016, the American Association for Cancer Research held a meeting of international childhood cancer predisposition syndrome experts to evaluate the current knowledge of these syndromes and to propose consensus surveillance recommendations. Herein, we summarize clinical and genetic aspects of RASopathies and Sotos, Weaver, Rubinstein-Taybi, Schinzel-Giedion, and NKX2-1 syndromes as well as specific metabolic disorders known to be associated with increased childhood cancer risk. In addition, the expert panel reviewed whether sufficient data exist to make a recommendation that all patients with these disorders be offered cancer surveillance. For all syndromes, the panel recommends increased awareness and prompt assessment of clinical symptoms. Patients with Costello syndrome have the highest cancer risk, and cancer surveillance should be considered. Regular physical examinations and complete blood counts can be performed in infants with Noonan syndrome if specific PTPN11 or KRAS mutations are present, and in patients with CBL syndrome. Also, the high brain tumor risk in patients with L-2 hydroxyglutaric aciduria may warrant regular screening with brain MRIs. For most syndromes, surveillance may be needed for nonmalignant health problems. Clin Cancer Res; 23(12); e83-e90. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 12%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 43 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 48 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,464,855
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#2,075
of 12,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,013
of 317,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#50
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.