↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for Screening and Management of Late Effects in Patients with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency after Allogenic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Consensus Statement from the…

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations for Screening and Management of Late Effects in Patients with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency after Allogenic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Consensus Statement from the Second Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium International Conference on Late Effects after Pediatric HCT
Published in
Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.04.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Heimall, Rebecca H. Buckley, Jennifer Puck, Thomas A. Fleisher, Andrew R. Gennery, Elie Haddad, Benedicte Neven, Mary Slatter, Skinner Roderick, K. Scott Baker, Andrew C. Dietz, Christine Duncan, Linda M. Griffith, Luigi Notarangelo, Michael A. Pulsipher, Morton J. Cowan

Abstract

Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) is effectively treated with HCT with overall survival approaching 90% in contemporary reports. However, survivors are at risk for development of late complications due to the variable durability of high quality immune function, underlying genotype of SCID, comorbidities due to infections in the pre- and post- transplant period and use of conditioning pre-transplant. An international group of transplant experts was convened in 2016 to review the current knowledge of late effects seen in SCID patients following HCT, and develop recommendations for screening and monitoring for late effects. This report provides recommendations for screening and management of pediatric and adult SCID patients treated with HCT.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Engineering 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,830,773
of 12,494,388 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation
#457
of 2,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,686
of 266,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation
#26
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,494,388 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.