Genetic risk prediction scores (GRIPS tool, Iglesias et al 2014) https://t.co/8SSrHk58WY
Good review of published articles based on the Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies https://t.co/jmVbvvoCpt
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @DrKhouryCDC: In spite of existing recommendations for reporting genetic risk prediction studies, reporting is suboptimal in scientific…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @DrKhouryCDC: In spite of existing recommendations for reporting genetic risk prediction studies, reporting is suboptimal in scientific…
RT @DrKhouryCDC: In spite of existing recommendations for reporting genetic risk prediction studies, reporting is suboptimal in scientific…
RT @DrKhouryCDC: In spite of existing recommendations for reporting genetic risk prediction studies, reporting is suboptimal in scientific…
RT @DrKhouryCDC: In spite of existing recommendations for reporting genetic risk prediction studies, reporting is suboptimal in scientific…
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl repo…
RT @DrKhouryCDC: In spite of existing recommendations for reporting genetic risk prediction studies, reporting is suboptimal in scientific…
Same for other types of studies. We have done a bad job of educating authors about good publishing practices (incl reporting guidelines) and journals that endorse reporting guidelines do nothing to enforce them. This does not make for good science! @EQUATO
In spite of existing recommendations for reporting genetic risk prediction studies, reporting is suboptimal in scientific papers. https://t.co/JHKhhcKeDh https://t.co/Q89ic5X9xp
CDC study: Scientific reporting is suboptimal in genetic risk prediction studies for model construction & validation http://t.co/kmD1q3kOz7