| Title |
Guidelines for the design, analysis and interpretation of ‘omics’ data: focus on human endometrium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Reproduction Update, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/humupd/dmt048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Signe Altmäe, Francisco J. Esteban, Anneli Stavreus-Evers, Carlos Simón, Linda Giudice, Bruce A. Lessey, Jose A. Horcajadas, Nick S. Macklon, Thomas D'Hooghe, Cristina Campoy, Bart C. Fauser, Lois A. Salamonsen, Andres Salumets |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 18% |
| Researcher | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 22% |
| Unknown | 36 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,988,646
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction Update
#937
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,549
of 222,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction Update
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.