↓ Skip to main content

Zika Virus Seroprevalence, French Polynesia, 2014–2015 - Volume 23, Number 4—April 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Zika Virus Seroprevalence, French Polynesia, 2014–2015 - Volume 23, Number 4—April 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, April 2017
DOI 10.3201/eid2304.161549
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maite Aubry, Anita Teissier, Michael Huart, Sébastien Merceron, Jessica Vanhomwegen, Claudine Roche, Anne-Laure Vial, Sylvianne Teururai, Sébastien Sicard, Sylvie Paulous, Philippe Desprès, Jean-Claude Manuguerra, Henri-Pierre Mallet, Didier Musso, Xavier Deparis, Van-Mai Cao-Lormeau

Abstract

During 2013-2014, French Polynesia experienced an outbreak of Zika virus infection. Serosurveys conducted at the end of the outbreak and 18 months later showed lower than expected disease prevalence rates (49%) and asymptomatic:symptomatic case ratios (1:1) in the general population but significantly different prevalence rates (66%) and asymptomatic:symptomatic ratios (1:2) in schoolchildren.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,663,012
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#1,878
of 9,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,706
of 323,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#37
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.