| Title |
Laboratory and clinical genomic data sharing is crucial to improving genetic health care: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/gim.2016.196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
ACMG Board of Directors |
| Abstract |
Disclaimer: These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other health-care providers, to help them provide quality medical genetic services. Adherence to these recommendations does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These recommendations should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the geneticist should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. It may be prudent, however, to document in the patient's record the rationale for any significant deviation from these recommendations.Genet Med advance online publication 05 January 2017Genetics in Medicine (2017); doi:10.1038/gim.2016.196. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 219 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 73 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 8% |
| Canada | 8 | 4% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Argentina | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 74 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 142 | 65% |
| Scientists | 61 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#230,900
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#35
of 2,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,886
of 422,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.