| Title |
Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.10.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marilyn M. Li, Michael Datto, Eric J. Duncavage, Shashikant Kulkarni, Neal I. Lindeman, Somak Roy, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Cindy L. Vnencak-Jones, Daynna J. Wolff, Anas Younes, Marina N. Nikiforova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 39% |
| Spain | 9 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 48% |
| Scientists | 54 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1170 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 223 | 19% |
| Other | 126 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 123 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 108 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 5% |
| Other | 170 | 14% |
| Unknown | 360 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 320 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 243 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 113 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 1% |
| Other | 76 | 6% |
| Unknown | 380 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 242. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#157,589
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
#14
of 1,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,366
of 425,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.