RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
Oof.
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
【危険信号】 さて、cdcが出した二価ワクのVE速報 https://t.co/haEsT9LbGx
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
@UofCAHealth @UofCalifornia @NCM4Ever
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @SukunaBikona7: 従来型2回以上接種と比較した従来型2回以上接種+2価ワクチン1回接種の相対的な発症予防効果(最終の従来型接種から2-3ヶ月→8ヶ月以上)は18-49歳30%→56%、50-64歳31%→48%、65歳以上28%→43%。 https://t…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @AAPSonline: Receiving more doses does not seem to add much to vaccine efficacy as far as prevention of infection. Not to mention there…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @SukunaBikona7: 従来型2回以上接種と比較した従来型2回以上接種+2価ワクチン1回接種の相対的な発症予防効果(最終の従来型接種から2-3ヶ月→8ヶ月以上)は18-49歳30%→56%、50-64歳31%→48%、65歳以上28%→43%。 https://t…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @SukunaBikona7: 従来型2回以上接種と比較した従来型2回以上接種+2価ワクチン1回接種の相対的な発症予防効果(最終の従来型接種から2-3ヶ月→8ヶ月以上)は18-49歳30%→56%、50-64歳31%→48%、65歳以上28%→43%。 https://t…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
On the same 8 mice?
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
New data on the bivalent booster. Cliff note: reduction of risk of symptomatic COVID by 56% in those aged 18-49 yrs, 48% in 50-64 yrs, and 43% in those 65 or older. https://t.co/vBi16Y2dWV
RT @Alexander_Tin: New in @CDCMMWR: our first look at effectiveness of updated bivalent boosters relative to 2 monovalent shots against s…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @SukunaBikona7: 従来型2回以上接種と比較した従来型2回以上接種+2価ワクチン1回接種の相対的な発症予防効果(最終の従来型接種から2-3ヶ月→8ヶ月以上)は18-49歳30%→56%、50-64歳31%→48%、65歳以上28%→43%。 https://t…
RT @celinegounder: 1/ @CDC released a new @MMWR report today on the effectiveness of the updated bivalent COVID boosters. https://t.co/xhd…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @celinegounder: 1/ @CDC released a new @MMWR report today on the effectiveness of the updated bivalent COVID boosters. https://t.co/xhd…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @celinegounder: 1/ @CDC released a new @MMWR report today on the effectiveness of the updated bivalent COVID boosters. https://t.co/xhd…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @celinegounder: 1/ @CDC released a new @MMWR report today on the effectiveness of the updated bivalent COVID boosters. https://t.co/xhd…
RT @celinegounder: 1/ @CDC released a new @MMWR report today on the effectiveness of the updated bivalent COVID boosters. https://t.co/xhd…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @celinegounder: 1/ @CDC released a new @MMWR report today on the effectiveness of the updated bivalent COVID boosters. https://t.co/xhd…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @celinegounder: 1/ @CDC released a new @MMWR report today on the effectiveness of the updated bivalent COVID boosters. https://t.co/xhd…
Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vac in Prevent Symptomatic SARSCoV2 Infection;US, Sept–Nov 2022: (rVE) of bivalent booster vs ≥2 monovalent vac in 2–3mth & ≥8mth elapsed since last monovalent was 30% & 56% in 18–49yr, 31% & 48% in 50–64yr,28% &a
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
@DailyCaller Hey Daily Caller, do you want to let him know about this ⬇️?
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @Alexander_Tin: New in @CDCMMWR: our first look at effectiveness of updated bivalent boosters relative to 2 monovalent shots against s…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
1/ @CDC released a new @MMWR report today on the effectiveness of the updated bivalent COVID boosters. https://t.co/xhd5Pmeqh0 Takeaway for the general public: the updated boosters will provide additional protection compared to no booster vs symptomatic
RT @MartyMakary: CDC just released its bivalent vax study-says effectiveness "should be interpreted with caution because unvaccinated perso…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: These data are garbage If you randomized I bet VE 0-5% This is confounding + VE The people who leapt to get this vaccine…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: Oh boy. @CDCgov released data on the new bivalent booster & it doesn't look good at 2-3 months. They used test negative…