| Title |
International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG) consensus recommendations: Hearing loss in the pediatric patient
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bryan J. Liming, John Carter, Alan Cheng, Daniel Choo, John Curotta, Daniela Carvalho, John A. Germiller, Stephen Hone, Margaret A. Kenna, Natalie Loundon, Diego Preciado, Anne Schilder, Brian J. Reilly, Stephane Roman, Julie Strychowsky, Jean-Michel Triglia, Nancy Young, Richard J.H. Smith |
| Abstract |
To provide recommendations for the workup of hearing loss in the pediatric patient. Expert opinion by the members of the International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group. Consensus recommendations include initial screening and diagnosis as well as the workup of sensorineural, conductive and mixed hearing loss in children. The consensus statement discusses the role of genetic testing and imaging and provides algorithms to guide the workup of children with hearing loss. The workup of children with hearing loss can be guided by the recommendations provided herein. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 26% |
| Unknown | 31 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
#2,090
of 3,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,119
of 329,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
#29
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.