↓ Skip to main content

Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 9: Arrhythmias and Conduction Defects A Scientific Statement From the American…

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 9: Arrhythmias and Conduction Defects A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology
Published in
JACC, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas P. Zipes, Mark S. Link, Michael J. Ackerman, Richard J. Kovacs, Robert J. Myerburg, N.A. Mark Estes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Other 13 13%
Professor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#16,264
of 16,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,629
of 296,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#250
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.