↓ Skip to main content

Hearing Loss in Infants with Microcephaly and Evidence of Congenital Zika Virus Infection - Brazil, November 2015-May 2016.

Overview of attention for article published in MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
117 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
Hearing Loss in Infants with Microcephaly and Evidence of Congenital Zika Virus Infection - Brazil, November 2015-May 2016.
Published in
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, September 2016
DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6534e3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana C Leal, Lilian F Muniz, Tamires S A Ferreira, Cristiane M Santos, Luciana C Almeida, Vanessa Van Der Linden, Regina C F Ramos, Laura C Rodrigues, Silvio S Caldas Neto

Abstract

Congenital infection with Zika virus causes microcephaly and other brain abnormalities (1). Hearing loss associated with other congenital viral infections is well described; however, little is known about hearing loss in infants with congenital Zika virus infection. A retrospective assessment of a series of 70 infants aged 0-10 months with microcephaly and laboratory evidence of Zika virus infection was conducted by the Hospital Agamenon Magalhães in Brazil and partners. The infants were enrolled during November 2015-May 2016 and had screening and diagnostic hearing tests. Five (7%) infants had sensorineural hearing loss, all of whom had severe microcephaly; however, one child was tested after receiving treatment with an ototoxic antibiotic. If this child is excluded, the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss was 5.8% (four of 69), which is similar to that seen in association with other congenital viral infections. Additional information is needed to understand the prevalence and spectrum of hearing loss in children with congenital Zika virus infection; all infants born to women with evidence of Zika virus infection during pregnancy should have their hearing tested, including infants who appear normal at birth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 322 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Researcher 36 11%
Student > Postgraduate 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 9%
Other 74 23%
Unknown 65 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 3%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 86 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2018.
All research outputs
#282,132
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#1,150
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,433
of 349,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#25
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 336.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.