↓ Skip to main content

Notes from the Field : Kratom ( Mitragyna speciosa ) Exposures Reported to Poison Centers — United States, 2010–2015

Overview of attention for article published in MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
62 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
twitter
70 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Notes from the Field : Kratom ( Mitragyna speciosa ) Exposures Reported to Poison Centers — United States, 2010–2015
Published in
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, July 2016
DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6529a4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehruba Anwar, Royal Law, Josh Schier

Abstract

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is a plant consumed throughout the world for its stimulant effects and as an opioid substitute (1). It is typically brewed into a tea, chewed, smoked, or ingested in capsules (2). It is also known as Thang, Kakuam, Thom, Ketum, and Biak (3). The Drug Enforcement Administration includes kratom on its Drugs of Concern list (substances that are not currently regulated by the Controlled Substances Act, but that pose risks to persons who abuse them), and the National Institute of Drug Abuse has identified kratom as an emerging drug of abuse (3,4). Published case reports have associated kratom exposure with psychosis, seizures, and deaths (5,6). Because deaths have been attributed to kratom in the United States (7), some jurisdictions have passed or are considering legislation to make kratom use a felony (8). CDC characterized kratom exposures that were reported to poison centers and uploaded to the National Poison Data System (NPDS) during January 2010-December 2015. The NPDS is a national database of information logged by the country's regional poison centers serving all 50 United States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico and is maintained by the American Association of Poison Control Centers. NPDS case records are the result of call reports made by the public and health care providers.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Researcher 7 16%
Unspecified 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 6 13%
Other 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Unspecified 8 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 16%
Chemistry 5 11%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 11 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 630. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2019.
All research outputs
#9,468
of 12,986,005 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#65
of 2,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#497
of 261,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,986,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 81.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them